Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:04:39AM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
>> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 11:32:54PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
>>>> On Monday 07 May 2007 11:02:29 pm Micha Feigin wrote:
>>>>> Sorry, got it wrong, missed the special == "none" in the lyx file and the
>>>>> not is binary instead of logical (too many programing languages in
>>>>> parallel
>>>>> ... )
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway this is supposed to be the correct patch (I hope I got the
>>>>> indentation according to the coding convention).
>>>> Martin, what do you have to say about this?
>>>>
>>>> It is proposed as a fix for bug 3242.
>>> If it works...
>>>
>>> Does this mean that a height value of 0 is now taken as a request
>>> for default height?
>>>
>>> I suppose it is safe as it is a physically unrealistic value.
>>
>> why is this physically unrelated? It is the value for a vertical
>> box of height 0pt, which may be useful just like \makebox[0pt]...
>>
>> Herbert
>
> Ah. Do you see a possible conflict here?
possible optional arguments
\parbox[valign]{width}
\parbox[valign][height]{width}
\parbox[ivalign][valign][height]{width}
This must be controlled by LyX, eg. existing ivalign and heigth
without a valign (vertical position) is not possible, and so on.
A 0pt for the height is a valid entry.
Don't know, if the current cvs works in this way.
Herbert
