Herbert Voss wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:04:39AM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
>>> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>>>> On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 11:32:54PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
>>>>> On Monday 07 May 2007 11:02:29 pm Micha Feigin wrote:
>>>>>> Sorry, got it wrong, missed the special == "none" in the lyx file and the
>>>>>> not is binary instead of logical (too many programing languages in
>>>>>> parallel
>>>>>> ... )
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyway this is supposed to be the correct patch (I hope I got the
>>>>>> indentation according to the coding convention).
>>>>> Martin, what do you have to say about this?
>>>>>
>>>>> It is proposed as a fix for bug 3242.
>>>> If it works...
>>>>
>>>> Does this mean that a height value of 0 is now taken as a request
>>>> for default height?
>>>>
>>>> I suppose it is safe as it is a physically unrealistic value.
>>> why is this physically unrelated? It is the value for a vertical
>>> box of height 0pt, which may be useful just like \makebox[0pt]...
>>>
>>> Herbert
>> Ah. Do you see a possible conflict here?
>
>
> possible optional arguments
> \parbox[valign]{width}
> \parbox[valign][height]{width}
> \parbox[ivalign][valign][height]{width}
sorry, the last one should be
\parbox[valign][height][ivalign]{width}
Herbert
