> Another one is too little focus on 1.5.0 release. For example, restarting
> the work on insetlisting now is ridicolous.
I have never been a model developer in this regard because I had never
'focused' on 1.5.0 due to my very limited time. This time, I *really*
need this feature for my own work so I am willing to spend some time
on this feature. Jose happens to like it as well.
Because I can put all \lstset to preambles, all I need is an ERT like
inset that can put \begin{lstlisting} \end{lstlisting} around the code
within. Herbert's work focuses more on parameters (\lstset stuff) and
file include \lstlistinginput which can be delayed, at least for me.
I will propose a very simple listings inset that is enough for my own
use. It should be easy enough not to introduce any bug (almost
identical to ERT). Then, a dialog like what Herbert proposed can be
added later after 1.5.0. include dialog and file -> settings changes
can also be done at that time.
Jose, what do you think?
Bo
