On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 04:24:24PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> Bo> On 1/30/07, Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Georg Baum wrote: > No, it is not.
> >> 
> >> So plesae, Bo, enclose your changes in #ifdef's. Breaking older qt
> >> versions is not acceptable IMHO.
> 
> Bo> Please add them when you are implementing your patch. I did not do
> Bo> it because I thought that we are going to bundle qt libs with lyx
> Bo> on all platforms. After all, qt4 is not standard on any platform.
> 
> I'm glad I won't be maintainer ;)

We are currently releasing a new version of my day job's
bread-and-butter product for four versions of Windows and
fifteen(!) variations of Linux. And yes, there are Qt 4.2
based components in there.

Andre'

Reply via email to