Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 06:11:37PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > |
| > | So I suggest that we do the extra step and finish the Filename class
| > | instead of moving little by little everytime a bug is discovered.
| >
| > I suggest using boost::fs as the underlying mech. for filesystem work.
|
| Are there any specific reasons to prefer boost::fs over QFile?
|
| I know I had troubles with boost::fs two years or so ago and QFile just
| worked for *nix and Win* out of the box.
Only that we go further into the Qt pit.
Also QFile will never get standarized, boost::fs might be.
--
Lgb
