On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 06:11:37PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | > | So I suggest that we do the extra step and finish the Filename class > | instead of moving little by little everytime a bug is discovered. > > I suggest using boost::fs as the underlying mech. for filesystem work.
Are there any specific reasons to prefer boost::fs over QFile? I know I had troubles with boost::fs two years or so ago and QFile just worked for *nix and Win* out of the box. Andre'
