Duncan Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| gcc 2.96 has trouble with the test inset too. I am sure this is a bug but not 
| sure what the correct fix actually is, as ignoring const is not nescarily 
| safe. Could someone who knows the coed better determine whether a cast, 
| prototype twiddle or massive code change is appropiate here?

If the same code compiles with gcc 2.95.2 it is most likely gcc 2.96's
problem.

        Lgb

Reply via email to