Duncan Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | gcc 2.96 has trouble with the test inset too. I am sure this is a bug but not | sure what the correct fix actually is, as ignoring const is not nescarily | safe. Could someone who knows the coed better determine whether a cast, | prototype twiddle or massive code change is appropiate here? If the same code compiles with gcc 2.95.2 it is most likely gcc 2.96's problem. Lgb
- Re: Bugs in the text in... Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Bugs in the text in... Dekel Tsur
- Re: Bugs in the text in... Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Bugs in the text in... Garst R. Reese
- Re: Bugs in the text in... Allan Rae
- Re: Bugs in the text in... Garst R. Reese
- Re: Bugs in the text in... Allan Rae
- Re: Bugs in the text in... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Bugs in the text in... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Bugs in the text in... Duncan Simpson
- Re: Bugs in the text in... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Bugs in the text in... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Bugs in the text inset Jean-Marc Lasgouttes