Sigh. Once again: tex2lyx _must not_ be changed unless somebody implements
the changes from format 245 to 254 first. Otherwise tex2lyx will generate
invalid files.

I was asking if someone can complete this patch with needed tex2lyx
changes so that this patch will *not* produce invalid files. What is
wrong with that?

> -        os << "\n\\newpage\n";
> +        os << "\n" << latexLabel() << '\n';

Why this?

latexLabel is a virtual function that return newpage, clearpage or
cleardoublepage.

If you want to do all in one inset,

I guess you did not look at the patch close enough.

IMO we should either use the version of Ugras, or not create any new

My patch is virtually the same as Ugras, which is in my opinion
cleaner, although you obviously did not see this.

Cheers,
Bo

Reply via email to