Am Freitag, 10. November 2006 22:39 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > Because the plan is to move toc.[Ch] altogether. We can then rename > TocBackend to something else if you want.
I don't care about the name as long as the code speaks for itself. > > I do neither understand why TocBackend is not in namespace toc. > > Could be indeed. But we decided that we will only do lyx and > lyx::support and lyx::frontend from now on, didn't we? I did not notice that, but in that case nothing should be in that namespace. I am not picky about namespaces in general, the important thing for me is that there is some logic in the naming. > TocBackend. The typedefs are just there because of API compatibility > issue; see my other mail. I understand that now, but it took me some time. If you do something like this the next time please add some comments. Georg
