On 13-Apr-2000 Dekel Tsur wrote:
[sniped good explanation]
>
> 3. I think that it is easier to implement in LyX.
> Implementing the automatic approach requires doing changes in
> LyXParagraph::SimpleTeXOnePar, and LyXParagraph::SimpleTeXOneTablePar
> (since in the latex output, a number should be enclosed by \beginL .. \endL).
> With my approach, this is not needed (the \beginL .. \endL are generated by
> LyXFont::latexWriteStartChanges & LyXFont::latexWriteEndChanges).
Ok this seems to me like a good idea. Thanks for explaining it to me so
clearly #:O), yes indeed it seems better to have a manual override.
I really like to have some fresh blood in the developers team and you seem
to do a really good job!!!
Do you remove the number-inset stuff or should I do it for you, as it
seems this is not needed anymore and we should remove dead code!
Jürgen
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel: +39-0471-450260
I-39100 Bozen Fax: +39-0471-450296
ITALY Web: http://www.sad.it/~jug
It has long been an axiom of mine that the little things are infinitely
the most important.
-- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, "A Case of Identity"
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
