On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 07:49:46PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Am Montag, 30. Oktober 2006 19:17 schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > > The attached patch fixes the \sinx problem. > > Good that you found it. > > > Any objections to applying it? > > Yes. isAlpha() should be implemented as an ucs4 function, and if a hack is > needed it should be done inside this function.
An hack? What do you mean? > Then I would also like to know why this problem was introduced. Probably > not by removing the code you just added (or was it done by accident?). Probably by adding the overloaded << operator and not taking the appropriate actions. Last week it was really difficult to follow all changes... > Are > you sure that you do not trigger another problem that was to be solved by > the patch that created the \sinx problem? No, I am not sure of anything, but I can't see what problem could be introduced. The \sinx problem was introduced by overlooking, IMO. -- Enrico
