>>>>> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> Mixing the two previous paragraphs, that means that we should José> release a product as soon as possible when certain requirements José> are met, those requirements are: - to have a stable frontend; - José> no (known) regressions are allowed against old documents, if a José> document works for 1.4 it should work as well in 1.5 without any José> change from user. - The last requirement does not applies José> vice-versa, it is possible to have a document that works for 1.5 José> that when backported does not work for 1.4, I will try to fix José> those cases but they are not our priority (back-port is a José> convenience). Agreed. José> My proposal follows that coming from the meeting to enter a José> period of feature freeze, that is no more features are allowed José> at this point. Our goal now should be to stabilise the new José> changes and to coordinate with the present stable branch to make José> the transition the smoothest possible for the new stable release José> (1.5 when released). OK. José> Again following the previous reasoning, I propose the José> following, we should revert the removal of qt3 from lyx 1.5, now José> that we have manage to keep it until the feature freeze it would José> look like throwing the baby with the water (following one José> previous analogy of Angus on this list). I guess Juergen and Georg are the ones who can answer to this. Were there many changes after qt3 was nuked? José> For 1.6 I propose to remove qt3 and completely have it José> superseeded by qt4. This is OK. Thanks for doing that José, JMarc
