Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote:
|
| > Qt3 can be resurrected if someone wants to, but all others on the list
| > were positive about this.
|
| Resurrecting qt3 is ridicolous. qt3 was removed because "it was eating too
| many resources to keep it even if it is allowed to rot", and now you
| suggest that those who want to keep it can resurrect it? The only sensible
| option for keeping qt3 would have been to let it stay in trunk. Any other
| way to keep it is bullshit, because that would eat far more resources.
And that would be _your_ resources to use. Not mine. (as was the case)
--
Lgb
