On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 09:44:25AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>>>> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > José> On Monday 25 September 2006 09:09, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >> Yes, we should carry as many layout files as possible. What we need > >> is a short LaTeXConfig blurb, and some documentation for Extended > >> when the use is not trivial (like when title should be put in the > >> preamble). > > José> Why not an example file or a template. I don't expect anyone > José> to read Extended just to use a new layout. But I see your point. > José> I'll have to think a bit more about possible alternatives. > > Well, Extended is where we put these things now. A template would not > hurt either (but templates for rare class files seem to confuse users > more than anything else). > > JMarc
OK, I have the following layouts (and in many cases class files)
ion.layout ion.cls Institute of Navigation proceedings
njsr.layout njsr.cls Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real
Estate Research
iagproc.layout iagproc.cls Int. Association of Geodesy Proceedings
isprs.layout Int. Society of Photogrammetry and
Remote Sensing
The isprs class file is semi-official, the others are (mostly) homegrown.
I have them (except isprs.layout, which is new) on my own website.
Should these really be packaged with LyX?
- Martin
pgpFD8Vvk38em.pgp
Description: PGP signature
