Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Could be replaced by
| | + return lyxview_.view()->buffer() != 0; | | if you want. I don't really care about either style.

In this particular case the c-idom is not so strong, so yes, I'd
prefere the explict check. Please do that.

done.

Reply via email to