On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 11:20:23AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>>>> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Martin> Probably so... but one additional reason for dropping xforms > Martin> was undoubtedly that it wasn't up to the same standard any > Martin> more, and falling behind by not being actively maintained. I > Martin> mean, the qt version _looks_ good. > > And there is nothing that the qt4 version can do that cannot be done > by qt3 (which was not the case with xforms).
Are you discussing for academic reasons or do you really have a problem with the removal of the Qt 3? Andre'
