On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 12:09:59PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: ... > > Honestly do you think that xforms would have remained after including > >unicode? > > The xform frontend could have been maintained and restricted to the 8 > bit ascii subset of unicode. It _was_ possible really and not that much > work if you think about it. At least not more work than qt3 or gtk for > someone who knows xforms. > > Now, the consensus was there for xforms so, no, I don't think it would > have survived unicode.
Probably so... but one additional reason for dropping xforms was undoubtedly that it wasn't up to the same standard any more, and falling behind by not being actively maintained. I mean, the qt version _looks_ good. - Martin
pgpN9kVHlCTk8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
