Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Man, it's easy to select only some mail and not others... > > | I have taken into account all comments except for the spellchecker > | changes. I am tired and too lazy to do it... But I will put Ispell > | back if there is consensus about that. > > No need for consensus. Just put it back. Even better: get some rest. > Fixup the patch to not remove it, and then commit.
For fuck's sake, Abdel. He's saying commit some entirely separate patch but don't mix up two unrelated changes. The reason being that he cares about Subversion history; one logical change, one commit. > | So, you agree to remove ispell and pspell support? > Hmm... I thouht you were going to add enchant support? > Why do you have to remove ispell and pspell to do that? > Obviously we are not in agreement after all. Where's the "NO!"? He's asked two questions. If you can't sell the bigger picture why should he buy it from you? I'm bored of this. Angus