Angus Leeming wrote:
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 09:10:08PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote:
Decide on your own what that means for Qt3...
One small note: if qt3 dies (and the development cost does seem quite
onerous), then the first 1.5.0 release should have clear pointers and
instructions on how to get qt4 for common platforms. Aside from
non-bleeding-edge Linux distributions, there's also the BSDs and Solaris
to consider.
Sane points, John.
Personally, I'm sold on the "qt3 is redundant" argument. If it's a hassle,
kill it. However, I also buy into JMarc's complaints that there has been too
much noise from the "cry wolf" brigade. The strength of your argument is
reduced by the manner and the frequency of your shouting.
I believe on the contrary that that's the only way to achieve something
in this list. If not for the shouting xforms and qt3 would have been
maintained painfully until 1.5.
Abdel.
