>>>>> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dekel> I'm not sure yet, but there are several useful (or not)
Dekel> commands that aren't in the menus like appendix, math-number,
Dekel> math-greek-toggle, math-limits etc.
The first thing to do is probably to port the menu code from the old
devel branch to the new one. With this code, the menus are described
in a configuration file.
>> | 2. Why the standard article/book textclasses do not contain
>> theorem,lemma,etc. | layouts?
>>
>> Because those layouts does not have them? (layouts are based upon
>> latex documentclasses, and tries to map them)
Dekel> The standard latex article class doesn't contain lyx-code or
Dekel> lyx-list environments either. I think that the theorem layouts
Dekel> should be in all article/book documentclass, as this will make
Dekel> LyX easier for LyX beginners who want to write mathematical
Dekel> text.
The problem with the theorem layouts is that there are many ways to
define them (numbered by sections, all with the same sequence or each
one with its own sequence...) and you can't provide all these choices
without problem. It is a real shame that the original latex classes
did not provide default environments for theorems. If we decide to add
all these choices, we'll have to support them for ever (and the code
in ams classes is not very nice nor convenient).
What I'd really like is some capability in LyX to declare theorems in
the document, like it is done in LaTeX. Or something else, if you have
better ideas.
JMarc
