> > And could have some more advantages. You could 'register' new functions > > at run time. You do not need a monolithic 2MB+ binary when you > > use only 10% of the functionality. > > Just load 'modules' dynamically on demand... > > Gawd, I wish I knew how to code that! If I did, I'd contribute > something using it to LyX. This is much easier than you'd expect. Have a look at the dlopen(3) man page for starters... However, I am not suggesting to actually start fiddling around with dynamic loadable modules in LyX. It could be a natural extension once LyX is no more Spaghett-yX ;-) Andre' -- André Pönitz ......................... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Compilers, exceptions, code size, etc. [was: Re: ... Andre' Poenitz
- Re: Compilers, exceptions, code size, etc. [was:... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Compilers, exceptions, code size, etc. [... Allan Rae
- Re: Compilers, exceptions, code size, et... Amir Karger
- Re: Compilers, exceptions, code size... Allan Rae
- Re: Compilers, exceptions, code... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Compilers, exceptions, ... Allan Rae
- Re: Compilers, exceptio... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Compilers, exceptions, code size, et... Andre' Poenitz
- Re: Compilers, exceptions, code size... John Weiss
- Re: Compilers, exceptions, code... Andre Poenitz
- Re: Compilers, exceptions, code size, etc. [was:... Arnd Hanses
- Re: Compilers, exceptions, code size, etc. [was:... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Compilers, exceptions, code size, etc. [was:... Arnd Hanses
- Re: Compilers, exceptions, code size, etc. [was:... Arnd Hanses