> > Oh I see. In this case, could you put i586 instead of i386 in the name, > please? Why should one put 'i586' into the name of a package that is supposed to work on the i386 architecture? Andre' -- Andre' Poenitz ...................... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Font and misc points [w... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Font and misc points [w... Seak, Teng-Fong
- Re: Font and misc points [w... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- examples for Re: [seak.teng-fong@iname.c... Seak, Teng-Fong
- Re: examples for Re: [seak.teng-fong... John Weiss
- [seak.teng-fong@iname.com] Feedback from www.lyx.org Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: [seak.teng-fong@iname.com] Feedback from www... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Official RPM package and icon file [was Re: ... Seak, Teng-Fong
- Re: Official RPM package and icon file [... Kayvan A. Sylvan
- Re: Official RPM package and icon fi... Seak, Teng-Fong
- Re: Official RPM package and ic... Andre' Poenitz
- Re: Official RPM package an... Seak, Teng-Fong
- Re: Official RPM package and ic... Allan Rae
- Re: Official RPM package an... Seak, Teng-Fong
- [seak.teng-fong@iname.com] Feedback from www.lyx.org Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: [seak.teng-fong@iname.com] Feedback from www... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: [seak.teng-fong@iname.com] Feedback from... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: [seak.teng-fong@iname.com] Feedback ... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: [seak.teng-fong@iname.com] Feedb... Nils Jeppe
- Re: [seak.teng-fong@iname.com] Feedb... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: [seak.teng-fong@iname.com] Feedback from... Seak, Teng-Fong