Re: Some compilation problems with latest cvs

[Lars Gullik Bjønnes]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| >>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| 
| Lars> We need to fix the check for std::string it is not good. I am
| Lars> not sure what we should have it do instead.
| 
| I do not know either...
| 
| Lars> Test if std:: is allowed first? and then depending use stack or
| Lars> std::stack
| 
| Another idea is to test whether using works first. I suspect that
| some compilers which do not support namespaces have using as a no-op. 

That is what I mean by the test for std:: was just a bit vague.

And some compilers that supports namespaces have std:: as a no op,
they allow it but does not act on it...so you can mix std::stack and
stack freely. (egcs, gcc 2.95)

| Lars> | The C header wrappers thing is something I intend to commit
| Lars> when | I have access to cvs.
| 
| Lars> You have access to cvs.
| 
| No, because I (still) rely on rsh.

And? The cvs repository on aussie is the same as on baywatch...ok you
have a problem with the repository named in CVS/ ok lets have reboot
of baywatch and see if that fixes the problem.

        Lgb