>>>>> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Amir> Um, maybe. Why would you need that extra information? The only
Amir> time it's referred to is when you're making a ref or pageref to
Amir> it, and then you're somewhere else in the document anyway. In
Amir> any case, I was just sort of hoping to start a discussion of
Amir> which insets should be changed/removed/added in 1.1. We
Amir> shouldn't be too complacent, assuming that the current GUI is
Amir> perfect. And as long as changes are small, continue to make
Amir> sense (or make more sense), and are documented, we don't have to
Amir> worry about confusing users either.
The idea is that when you read your document on screen, you see what
the label for some section is, and are likely to remember it when you
want a cross-reference. If some of your labels are not clear
(sec:section, for example :), you would have to look at all the
sections edit their label to search for the right one.
I agree however that in 1.1, we should be able to completely hide the
fact that there is a label...
>> I wanted to add something like that, but sent the message too
>> fast...
Amir> This is the problem with e-mail. Another problem is that some
Amir> people are so impressed with themselves for being able to send
Amir> mail quickly, that they end up sending two copies of their
Amir> replies to people sometimes. How sad.
I one of the wise people you seem to know is able to tell me how to
make sense of the GNUS manual and use gnus just to read mail, things
might improve...
JMarc
