On 14 Dec, To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There was an error in my previous message, where it said: > -XMGL seems to be a standard for the future, but word-processors > for it do exist, at least in the low-end market. It should say: > -XMGL seems to be a standard for the future, but word-processors > for it do NOT exist, at least in the low-end market. Xavier Calbet
- script language: global Larry S. Marso
- Re: script language: global Asger Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: script language: global Andre' Poenitz
- Re: script language: global Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: script language: global Garst R. Reese
- Re: script language: global Joacim Persson
- lyx2rtf xcalbet
- Re: lyx2rtf Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: lyx2rtf xcalbet
- Re: lyx2rtf Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- what the language should do xcalbet
- what the language should do Richard E. Hawkins Esq.
- Re: script language: global Jacek M. Holeczek
- Re: script language: global Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: script language: global John Weiss
- Re: script language: global Jacek M. Holeczek
- Re: script language: global Jean-Marc Lasgouttes