On Sun, 13 Dec 1998, Larry S. Marso wrote: > I'm trying to catch up with the mail on this topic. > > Might I ask, what are a few straightforward examples of the new capabilities > a scripting language will provide users of lyx? Or: What capabilities is it that we want, that we can't get (at all or efficiently) with Good Old(tm) C++ ? (um, compiled C++ that is) Isn't it a bit backward to evaluate scripting languages when we don't know what we want to do? A spec please! ;) Joacim - With both feet on the ground, you won't get very far. ä
- script language: global Larry S. Marso
- Re: script language: global Asger Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: script language: global Andre' Poenitz
- Re: script language: global Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: script language: global Garst R. Reese
- lyx2rtf Joacim Persson
- lyx2rtf xcalbet
- Re: lyx2rtf Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: lyx2rtf xcalbet
- Re: lyx2rtf Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: lyx2rtf xcalbet
- what the language should do Richard E. Hawkins Esq.
- Re: script language: global Jacek M. Holeczek
- Re: script language: global Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: script language: global John Weiss
- Re: script language: global Jacek M. Holeczek