On Tue, 9 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The route we are trying to take is to have a tk-independent LyX > > core, and let people develop native frontends on top of that. It is > > clear that KDE people, for example, would not want something which > > looks like a KDE app, but something which *is* a KDE app. > > I can understand that. But do you think there will still be a > window-manager-independent version of Lyx like there is today? Running KDE apps does not require the KDE window manager. Not that KDE doesn't bring along a certain level of overhead, but the window manager itself is optional, as is the X login replacement program (can't remember the name at the moment).
- Re: toolkit agnosticism Roland Krause
- Re: toolkit agnosticism Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: toolkit agnosticism Alejandro Aguilar Sierra
- Re: toolkit agnosticism Roland Krause
- Re: toolkit agnosticism Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: toolkit agnosticism Roland Krause
- Re: toolkit agnosticism Allan Rae
- Re: toolkit agnosticism Roland Krause
- Re: toolkit agnosticism Allan Rae
- Re: toolkit agnosticism johnston
- Re: toolkit agnosticism Eric J. Schwertfeger
- Re: toolkit agnosticism Jochen Kuepper
- Re: toolkit agnosticism Asger Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: toolkit agnosticism johnston
- Re: toolkit agnosticism Asger Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: toolkit agnosticism John Weiss
- Re: toolkit agnosticism Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: toolkit agnosticism John Weiss
- Re: toolkit agnosticism Steven van Dijk
- Re: toolkit agnosticism John Weiss
- Re: toolkit agnosticism Allan Rae
