On Tue, 26 Jan 1999, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote: > I agree that LyX as such is a word processor, but it's also a > document processor. I personally prefer "word processor", because > the term "document processor" makes me think of "food processor", for > some strange reason, although I haven't seen a recipe class (yet). :) So "word processor" doesn't make you think of "food processor" but "document processor" does. Curious rationale. I prefer the term "document processor" for the many reason several of us have discussed in this list and personally find the term "word processor" obsolete and unnapropiate. Alejandro
- Three pre-versions of PR doc Martin Vermeer
- RE: Three pre-versions of PR doc Roland Krause
- Re: Three pre-versions of PR doc Larry S. Marso
- Re: Three pre-versions of PR doc Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Three pre-versions of PR doc Garst R. Reese
- Re: Three pre-versions of PR doc Larry S. Marso
- Re: Three pre-versions of P... Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Three pre-versions ... Garst R. Reese
- Re: Three pre-versi... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Three pre-versions ... Alejandro Aguilar Sierra
- Re: Three pre-versi... David S de Lis
- Re: Three pre-versions ... John Weiss
- Re: Three pre-versi... Garst R. Reese
- Re: Three pre-versions of P... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Three pre-versions ... Garst R. Reese
- Re: Three pre-versions ... Larry S. Marso
- Re: Three pre-versi... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Three pre-versions of PR doc Jochen Kuepper
- Re: Three pre-versions of P... Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Three pre-versions ... Amir Karger