On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 09:35:51 -0600 Serge Hallyn <serge.hal...@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > > I also notice that currently it seems broken as the manpage says > > > that -R should imply -e > > > > Actually, it's not -R that implies -e, it's the -s option > > I was sure I saw a comment about -R implying -e, but I don't see it > now, so that's fine :) Great! > > while not elevating cgroup, for example? > > But I suspect there's a simpler rationale. Christian Seiler provided the explanation (he wrote the code in question), but I was struggling to get to the bottom of that as well. -- Nikola Kotur http://blog.kotur.org PGP key: http://bin.kotur.org/key.html
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation. Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Lxc-devel mailing list Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
