On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 05:48:26PM -0400, S.Çağlar Onur wrote: > Hey, > > It's not that important but I just wanted to learn your thoughts about > starting to use more predictable version names for releases. I was trying > to do some stuff based on the LXC version that is installed on the system > and realized that current naming is little different than what I was > expecting. > > Do you think something like following (and also starting to use > http://semver.org/ kind of naming) is acceptable? > > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac > index a523583..f466a43 100644 > --- a/configure.ac > +++ b/configure.ac > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ > # -*- Autoconf -*- > # Process this file with autoconf to produce a configure script. > > -AC_INIT([lxc], [1.0.0.alpha1]) > +AC_INIT([lxc], [1.0.0-alpha1]) > > AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR([configure.ac]) > AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR([config]) > > Best,
It doesn't really matter to me or to any of the Debian based distros, but I seem to remember the version number being a problem to the RPM based distros in the past, so I'd rather not change the format unless we first make sure it's going to work with everyone's packaging. (And if we do change format, I'd only start doing it with alpha2 to avoid some extra confusion) -- Stéphane Graber Ubuntu developer http://www.ubuntu.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Lxc-devel mailing list Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
