On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:48 PM, S.Çağlar Onur <cag...@10ur.org> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> It's not that important but I just wanted to learn your thoughts about
> starting to use more predictable version names for releases. I was trying
> to do some stuff based on the LXC version that is installed on the system
> and realized that current naming is little different than what I was
> expecting.
>
> Do you think something like following (and also starting to use
> http://semver.org/ kind of naming) is acceptable?
>
> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> index a523583..f466a43 100644
> --- a/configure.ac
> +++ b/configure.ac
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> # -*- Autoconf -*-
> # Process this file with autoconf to produce a configure script.
>
> -AC_INIT([lxc], [1.0.0.alpha1])
> +AC_INIT([lxc], [1.0.0-alpha1])
>
> AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR([configure.ac])
> AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR([config])
>
Doh, I meant (assuming semver is the way to go)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 092a67d..2680582 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
# -*- Autoconf -*-
# Process this file with autoconf to produce a configure script.
-AC_INIT([lxc], [1.0.0.alpha1])
+AC_INIT([lxc], [1.0.0-alpha.1])
AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR([configure.ac])
AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR([config])
--
S.Çağlar Onur <cag...@10ur.org>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Lxc-devel mailing list
Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
