Quoting Ward, David - 0663 - MITLL (david.w...@ll.mit.edu):
> On 03/30/2013 10:45 AM, Christian Seiler wrote:
> >This patch introduces the --clear-env and --keep-env options for
> >lxc-attach, that allows the user to specify whether the environment
> >should be passed on inside the container or not.
> >
> >This is to be expanded upon in later versions, this patch only
> >introduces the most basic functionality.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Christian Seiler <christian-+gpke3dh...@public.gmane.org>
> 
> The original intent of my earlier patch was to avoid different
> default behavior between lxc-execute and lxc-attach.  That no longer
> holds.  Can we apply these same changes below to lxc-execute please?

As I said somewhere in the thread, we'll want to use common code for
environment setting for those.  However, we took the patch for
lxc-attach now only because it was breaking a current use case for
Christian in v0.9.  Now for 1.0 we can pursue the right approach for
both.  If you and Christian want to work together on that, all the
better.

-serge

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Own the Future-Intel&reg; Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013
Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest.
Compete for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game 
on Steam. $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes. 
Submit your demo by 6/6/13. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel_levelupd2d
_______________________________________________
Lxc-devel mailing list
Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel

Reply via email to