05.02.2013 01:57, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 05.02.2013 01:53, Dwight Engen wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Dwight Engen <dwight.en...@oracle.com>
> [lots of changes, no explanation...]
>
> What for? Why?
>
> This change is purely cosmetic, it has no visible benefit
> (and no explanations are given in the patch too), but it
> sure breaks compatibility with previously installed and
> perfectly working systems and scripts.
>
> If you ask me, I'd say "definitely not". It is just not
> a smart move.
And rejecting perfectly good sender which is not in any block
lists, with good reputation, at MAIL FROM stage "due to anti-spam
policies" is yet another non-smart move. I understand this is
different people.
<dwight.en...@oracle.com>: host aserp1030.oracle.com[141.146.126.68] said: 554
5.3.0 5.7.1 Permanently rejected due to our anti-spam policies. (in reply
to MAIL FROM command)
(this is about isrv.corpit.ru[86.62.121.231] - our mail host).
Note that rejecting at MAIL FROM stage means, for example,
that we can't send email to postmaster to notify them that
their anti-spam policies are stupid.
Thanks,
/mjt
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013
and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb
_______________________________________________
Lxc-devel mailing list
Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
