Erik Christiansen <[email protected]>
writes:

> On the other hand, in the last quarter century, I've found traditional
> networking 100% reliable and easy to use, on HP-UX, Solaris (Sparc &
> x86), and several linux distros, both domestically and administering up
> to a dozen workstations. It is possible that I have never suffered ifup
> state confusion simply because I always use "ifconfig -a" to check
> interface state, simply through habit. (And if I'm not sure what I'm
> facing, then "/etc/init.d/networking restart" is zero risk in 99% of
> cases - a server with a single interface, which is in need of TLC.)

My impression is that Brian's talking about laptops that go walkies and
have multiple ifaces on the same net, which I guess is harder to magic
than a server, where you connect it up and then leave it alone forever.

ifupdown's codebase is certainly ugly and unloved -- until recently it
was still written in noweb!

_______________________________________________
luv-main mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main

Reply via email to