On 14 October 2014 20:32, Erik Christiansen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Unfortunately, the Wikipedia page says "In version 209, networkd was > integrated", so the "monolithic monster" raises its ugly head, perhaps > due to nothing more than misleading wording? > Depends what you mean by "integrated". My understanding is that systemd in no way requires systemd-networkd. I am not using systemd-networkd on any of my boxes. It is possible that systemd-networkd requires systemd. If this is the case, it will be because it requires services that have not been implement elsewhere - I would assume systemd-shim is the correct place to implement these services. In Debian, the systemd-networkd is provided by the systemd package. Maybe this is what the wikipedia page calls "Integrated"? I think it is possible to install the systemd package and not use systemd, however this isn't something that interests me personally. I am not a systemd developer however, so don't take my word for it. -- Brian May <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
