Russell Coker <[email protected]> writes:
> The way vi handles lines is good for source code but not good for
> documents. The up/down commands should go to the previous/next line
> of ~80 characters not the previous/next paragraph.
Boggle.
Are you saying you don't use hard wrapping?
Anyway I dunno about vim, but in Emacs it's configurable:
(setq line-move-visual nil) ; I am *not* a NOTEPAD.EXE refugee!
By default in Emacs 23+ <down> will move to the next visible line,
so if you have an 80x25 tty and you're at character 20 of a 400
character line, <down> will actually move you to character 100 of the
same (soft-wrapped) line.
(Or near enough -- my math may be off.)
SURELY that's equally configurable in vim.
_______________________________________________
luv-main mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
