On Wed, 2 Jul 2014 12:34:48 PM Noah O'Donoghue wrote: > I think this rules out ZFS for me... The main thing in ZFS's favor was to > have it backed by sun, but if it's been forked and is going off in it's own > direction then that kinda puts it on equal footing with btrfs from my > perspective.
On the other hand btrfs isn't (yet) the foundation for a 55 PB Lustre filesystem for the #3 (former #1) supercomputer on the Top500 list. :-) http://cdn.opensfs.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Morrone_Sequoia_LUG2013.pdf All the best, Chris -- Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
