On 02/07/14 12:34, Noah O'Donoghue wrote:
On 1 July 2014 12:29, Peter Ross <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
The development seems to be independent from +Sun/Oracle these
days. I am
not aware of active contributions from Oracle but I am not 100% sure.
I think this rules out ZFS for me... The main thing in ZFS's favor was
to have it backed by sun, but if it's been forked and is going off in
it's own direction then that kinda puts it on equal footing with btrfs
from my perspective.
FWIW, XFS over LVM might be another alternative. RHEL7 appear to be
going down that path:
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/7.0_Release_Notes/chap-Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux-7.0_Release_Notes-File_Systems.html
It does not do snapshots directly, leaving that job for the volume manager.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XFS#Snapshots
(I haven't personally used XFS yet (or ZFS or Btrfs for that matter.
IKR, I haven't lived! ;])
Crispy.
_______________________________________________
luv-main mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
