I'd prefer it if the mini/net installs were not on the QA tracker. They've been a good fallback for PowerPC and I wouldn't want to loose them. We've got enough to test and as has already been said, the installs take a long time and a lot of downloading. If the alternate CD passes it's testcases then the mini will be okay. ojordan Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 21:13:04 +0000 From: phi...@ubuntu.com To: maps.backw...@gmail.com; ubuntu-qa-requ...@lists.ubuntu.com CC: lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net; lars.noo...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Clean non-pae mini.iso install Agreed, I am including this one onto the 'main' QA team to get their input on adding the mini / net install isos to the qa tracker. Regards, Phill. On 16 February 2012 21:07, Maps Backward <maps.backw...@gmail.com> wrote: On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Lars Noodén <lars.noo...@gmail.com> wrote: What kind of feedback on the powerpc mini.iso (or other ppc images) is needed, how much, how often and where should it be reported? generally i would say http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/ and indeed there is powerpc alternate/desktop testcases under Lubuntu but i don't see netinstalls anywhere, even for Ubuntu. so i'm not sure how those are "officially" tracked. Phil, do you have any thoughts on this? that being said, i guess we should start by seeing if it works at all. do an install and then run the result. report any bugs with ubuntu-bug. tell us the results. wxl -- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
