On Wed, 05 Jul 2023, "Paul E. McKenney" <paul...@kernel.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 10:43:21AM -0400, Olivier Dion wrote: >> On Wed, 21 Jun 2023, "Paul E. McKenney" <paul...@kernel.org> wrote: >> > On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 02:53:51PM -0400, Olivier Dion wrote: >> > >> > Same question here on loss of volatile semantics. >> >> This apply to all review on volatile semantics. I added a >> cmm_cast_volatile() macro/template for C/C++ for adding the volatile >> qualifier to pointers passed to every atomic builtin calls. > > Sounds very good, thank you!
Maybe a case of synchronicity here, but I just stumble upon this <https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/p0062r1.html> where you seem to express the same concerns :-) -- Olivier Dion EfficiOS Inc. https://www.efficios.com _______________________________________________ lttng-dev mailing list lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
