Hi Helen,

That statement might appear in full in the OSPF draft, but in the ISIS draft, 
in Section 6, only the following appears:

        MITRE has approved this document for Public Release, Distribution 
Unlimited, with Public Release Case Number 19-3033.

You might want to update it with the complete statement. And does each approval 
have its own case number?

> On Mar 31, 2025, at 11:05 AM, Dr. Helen Chen <ingwherc...@mitre.org> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
>  
> Thank you to Acee for responding to Roman’s comment about the text in Section 
> 5.  The paragraph in its entirety is below, and I would argue that it 
> implicitly denies authority over the approval for publication of the document.
>  
> “Author affiliation with The MITRE Corporation is provided for
>    identification purposes only, and is not intended to convey or imply
>    MITRE's concurrence with, or support for, the positions, opinions or
>    viewpoints expressed.  MITRE has approved this document for Public
>    Release, Distribution Unlimited, with Public Release Case Number
>    18-3281.”
>  
> Thanks,
> Helen
>  
> P.S.  There are other RFCs with this same statement…
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8177/ 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8177/>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9129/ 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9129/>
>  
> From: Acee Lindem <acee.i...@gmail.com <mailto:acee.i...@gmail.com>>
> Date: Monday, March 31, 2025 at 1:18 PM
> To: r...@cert.org <mailto:r...@cert.org> <r...@cert.org 
> <mailto:r...@cert.org>>
> Cc: The IESG <i...@ietf.org <mailto:i...@ietf.org>>, 
> draft-ietf-ospf-sr-y...@ietf.org <mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-sr-y...@ietf.org> 
> <draft-ietf-ospf-sr-y...@ietf.org <mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-sr-y...@ietf.org>>, 
> lsr-chairs <lsr-cha...@ietf.org <mailto:lsr-cha...@ietf.org>>, lsr 
> <lsr@ietf.org <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>>, Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org 
> <mailto:cho...@chopps.org>>
> Subject: [EXT] Re: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on 
> draft-ietf-ospf-sr-yang-37: (with COMMENT)
> 
> > On Mar 31, 2025, at 12: 55 PM, Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ 
> > ietf. org> wrote: > > Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot 
> > position for > draft-ietf-ospf-sr-yang-37: No Objection > > When 
> > responding, please
>  
>  
> > On Mar 31, 2025, at 12:55 PM, Roman Danyliw via Datatracker 
> > <nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
> > 
> > Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-ospf-sr-yang-37: No Objection
> > 
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> > introductory paragraph, however.)
> > 
> > 
> > Please refer to 
> > https://urldefense.us/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_about_groups_iesg_statements_handling-2Dballot-2Dpositions_&d=DwIFaQ&c=Al8V6E3U0yBSSEuVtdZbGtsvjPA49U3WmtZAsdW0D_Q&r=WVXMYcDyzkUrp4AGAc8mPk-Nx7f5__4hGRNuy7YcFvc&m=rswRuEZ2QztIG1Dg50Ni6me-AfgWrdv4jlz0rQ9U4TtfQdeQCQAhYw3NWCUjYabm&s=AS90HK1kh-yCkZwj_S-tDsa4vfqKc_7do0sYoL_dihA&e=
> >  
> > <https://urldefense.us/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_about_groups_iesg_statements_handling-2Dballot-2Dpositions_&d=DwIFaQ&c=Al8V6E3U0yBSSEuVtdZbGtsvjPA49U3WmtZAsdW0D_Q&r=WVXMYcDyzkUrp4AGAc8mPk-Nx7f5__4hGRNuy7YcFvc&m=rswRuEZ2QztIG1Dg50Ni6me-AfgWrdv4jlz0rQ9U4TtfQdeQCQAhYw3NWCUjYabm&s=AS90HK1kh-yCkZwj_S-tDsa4vfqKc_7do0sYoL_dihA&e=>
> >  
> > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> > 
> > 
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > https://urldefense.us/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dospf-2Dsr-2Dyang_&d=DwIFaQ&c=Al8V6E3U0yBSSEuVtdZbGtsvjPA49U3WmtZAsdW0D_Q&r=WVXMYcDyzkUrp4AGAc8mPk-Nx7f5__4hGRNuy7YcFvc&m=rswRuEZ2QztIG1Dg50Ni6me-AfgWrdv4jlz0rQ9U4TtfQdeQCQAhYw3NWCUjYabm&s=6JrBJn2PLRI2bT5RVOC-DxxJz_u9KbRPtzZIrOGI_4A&e=
> >  
> > <https://urldefense.us/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dospf-2Dsr-2Dyang_&d=DwIFaQ&c=Al8V6E3U0yBSSEuVtdZbGtsvjPA49U3WmtZAsdW0D_Q&r=WVXMYcDyzkUrp4AGAc8mPk-Nx7f5__4hGRNuy7YcFvc&m=rswRuEZ2QztIG1Dg50Ni6me-AfgWrdv4jlz0rQ9U4TtfQdeQCQAhYw3NWCUjYabm&s=6JrBJn2PLRI2bT5RVOC-DxxJz_u9KbRPtzZIrOGI_4A&e=>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > COMMENT:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > Thank you to Gyan Mishra for the GENART review.
> > 
> > ** Section 5.
> >   MITRE has approved this document for Public
> >   Release, Distribution Unlimited, with Public Release Case Number
> >   18-3281.
> > 
> > While I appreciate the need to acknowledge those that fund an author’s time,
> > and that some employers have strict release review requirements, is the 
> > above
> > text necessary or can it be removed?  It implies that the named entity has
> > authority to approve the publication of the RFC once the content is in an 
> > I-D
> > (which it does not).
>  
> This was a requirement for the author to participate with an affiliation. It 
> would be difficult to remove this at this point.
>  
> Thanks,
> Acee
>  
>  
>  
> > 
> > 
> > 


Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanand...@gmail.com






_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list -- lsr@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to lsr-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to