Hi Les, all, First, I confirm that my comment was exactly how Rob interpreted it, not what was in Les example :-)
Putting that aside, I hear the argument raised by Tony and Chris. I consider the pending comment close. Les, I checked -13 and I’m fine with it. Thanks for the reactivity and for accommodating. Thank you all for the constructive discussion. Cheers, Med De : Robert Raszuk <rob...@raszuk.net> Envoyé : samedi 29 mars 2025 01:24 À : Tony Li <tony...@tony.li> Cc : Les Ginsberg <ginsb...@cisco.com>; BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET <mohamed.boucad...@orange.com>; The IESG <i...@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-lsr-multi-...@ietf.org; lsr-chairs <lsr-cha...@ietf.org>; lsr <lsr@ietf.org>; Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.i...@gmail.com> Objet : Re: [Lsr] Mohamed Boucadair's Yes on draft-ietf-lsr-multi-tlv-11: (with COMMENT) Hi Tony, Ok so the answer here is that since we have no upper bounds today on the number of atomic TLVs just the fact that we go one level down and allow grouping single TLV type into multiple parts causes not a significant risk one should worry about. If this is the answer I rest my case :) Thx, R. On Sat, Mar 29, 2025 at 1:16 AM Tony Li <tony...@tony.li<mailto:tony...@tony.li>> wrote: Hi Robert, > Sorry if I was not very clear but my point was that MP-TLV may be coming in > multiple LSPs - something which to the best of my understanding is not the > case today with any TLV type. On that basis as LSP length natural boundary is > gone it seems sky is the limit now. This is incorrect. A TLV may appear in many different framgments. For example, a router may have multiple adjacencies. These may be spread out across fragments. T ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- lsr@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to lsr-le...@ietf.org
