Hi Tony, Ok so the answer here is that since we have no upper bounds today on the number of atomic TLVs just the fact that we go one level down and allow grouping single TLV type into multiple parts causes not a significant risk one should worry about.
If this is the answer I rest my case :) Thx, R. On Sat, Mar 29, 2025 at 1:16 AM Tony Li <tony...@tony.li> wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > > Sorry if I was not very clear but my point was that MP-TLV may be coming > in multiple LSPs - something which to the best of my understanding is not > the case today with any TLV type. On that basis as LSP length natural > boundary is gone it seems sky is the limit now. > > > This is incorrect. A TLV may appear in many different framgments. For > example, a router may have multiple adjacencies. These may be spread out > across fragments. > > T > > >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- lsr@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to lsr-le...@ietf.org
