Robert - I am certain that Tony and I are in complete agreement - but I found his response a bit cryptic.
So, to provide more context, RFC 8918 is relevant - particularly Section 3.3. HTH Les > -----Original Message----- > From: Tony Li <tony1ath...@gmail.com> On Behalf Of Tony Li > Sent: Friday, February 21, 2025 8:07 AM > To: Robert Raszuk <rob...@raszuk.net> > Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsb...@cisco.com>; lsr <lsr@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [Lsr] [Last-Call] 答复: Re: 【Can you concatenate several pieces > together without one "explicit key" to identify them belong to the same > segment】Re: Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-multi-tlv-08 > > > Hi Robert, > > > If a peer happens not to recognize content of a sub-TLV within the first or > > N- > th part of the multi part TLV what is the expected behaviour ... is it to stop > parsing any subsequent content of given MP-TLV or skip unrecognized sub- > TLV and keep trying to decode the rest of them if of course it can get the > length > of it correctly and move to the next one ? > > > The beauty of TLVs is that you don’t have to parse everything to make > progress. > > So you do. > > T > _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- lsr@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to lsr-le...@ietf.org
