Me too.
Juniper Business Use Only From: Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2022 10:55 AM To: Robert Raszuk <[email protected]>; John E Drake <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Psenak (ppsenak) <[email protected]>; Ketan Talaulikar <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-ip-flexalgo-04 - "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" [External Email. Be cautious of content] Speaking as document shepherd and WG member: I don't have a problem with "MPLS SR and SRv6 data planes" but wouldn't be opposed to "MPLS SR and SRv6 logical data planes". Thanks, Acee From: Robert Raszuk <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Thursday, April 14, 2022 at 9:51 AM To: John E Drake <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "Peter Psenak (ppsenak)" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Ketan Talaulikar <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Acee Lindem <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-ip-flexalgo-04 - "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" Hi John, In the IETF context I have always associated 'data plane' with packet forwarding, No one disputes that. But the fact that various sub-data-planes are built on top of base physical data planes needs to be clearly distinguished. Kind regards, R.
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
