Speaking as document shepherd and WG member: I don’t have a problem with “MPLS SR and SRv6 data planes” but wouldn’t be opposed to “MPLS SR and SRv6 logical data planes”.
Thanks, Acee From: Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, April 14, 2022 at 9:51 AM To: John E Drake <[email protected]> Cc: "Peter Psenak (ppsenak)" <[email protected]>, Ketan Talaulikar <[email protected]>, Acee Lindem <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-ip-flexalgo-04 - "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" Hi John, In the IETF context I have always associated ‘data plane’ with packet forwarding, No one disputes that. But the fact that various sub-data-planes are built on top of base physical data planes needs to be clearly distinguished. Kind regards, R.
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
