Hi, Robert: Aijun Wang China Telecom
> On Nov 29, 2021, at 20:59, Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hey Peter, > >> think of it as LSP with the lifetime of 60 sec. Nothing magical about it. > > That 60 sec is not long enough. > > If folks do not want to quickly detect the failure by iBGP by running BFD def > iBGP holdtime is 180 sec ! So right there if you timeout PULSE after 60 sec > the broken best paths may kick in again. If anything I recommend you make it > min. 200 sec. > >> > Well unless you are going to send it in completely separate LSAs/LSPs >> > what you state above may not be really true. >> >> have you read draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-event-notification-00? >> It is using a completely new set of PDUs for its operation. > > Sure. That comment was more towards proposed PUA encoding. [WAJ] For PUA solution, when the router receives the prefix, it should check first its originator information. If it is NULL then trigger the overlay service switchover and noting else; if not, follow the normal LSA procedures. Is there any confused step? > > Thx, > R. > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
