Aijun,
[WAJ] As Peter and I state several times, we want to find the generic > solution for different scenarios. BGP exist or not. > Maybe you missed my point. I am not aware of any production router stack which would not support BGP. That is irrespective of if BGP is used for service distribution in any given network or not. Honestly I know deployments (hint MSDC) which do not use IGP, but I am not aware of any network which is not using BGP. But I am open to evaluate other protocols to distribute requested information. I am not stuck on BGP. As mentioned a lot of pub-sub message bus solutions fit that bill. Selective leaking requires the additional configuration which we want to > avoid from the beginning. > No one (well at least not me) would recommend any form of selective leaking by hand cfg. It goes without saying that subscription to selective leaking MUST be automated. For reliability, they can be sent several times(operator can configure), > doesn’t need last until the node is backup again. > That is interesting ... first time I hear that. And what if node which went down was removed from the network forever ? You will need to go to each ABR and manually stop PUAs/PULSES ? [WAJ] P2MP tunnel should take different action. Only the failure endpoint > will not be used. > Easy to say ... Sure you can remove the adj from FIB. But for how long - that is the question - very important when we are talking about any ephemeral form of signalling. Kind regards, Robert
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
