Many companies in the industry including mine are undergoing initiatives to replace offensive terminology in IT. One of the targeted terms is master/slave, which is used in OSPF database exchange and the terms appear in various documentation and displays for our OSPF routing daemon. I'm still waiting on guidance on whether or not industry-standard terms get a pass, but it's not looking good. Has anyone else encountered this issue and if so how have you handled it? If I'm going to need to change to terminology that does not match the RFC I'd like to be consistent with what others are doing.
Thank you, Mike ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- IBM Enterprise Network Solutions Architecture & Design ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Research Triangle Park, NC USA _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
