Muito legal Eduardo! so' dei uma olhada rapida, mas me parece muito legal o
projeto.

so' acho que em vez de mandar ver um manuscrito de 60 paginas voce teria
mais chances de feedback se fizesse 3 papers de 20 paginas. ou se fizesse
uns blog posts de 2 paginas. porque um texto de 60 paginas requer um
investimento de tempo gigantesco, nao?

abracos categoricos,
Valeria

On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 10:58 PM Eduardo Ochs <eduardoo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Oi todos,
>
> acabei de submeter um artigo que ficou bem bacana, dxô fazer
> propaganda dele aqui...
>
> Título: "On the missing diagrams in Category Theory"
> Links: http://angg.twu.net/LATEX/2022on-the-missing.pdf
>        http://angg.twu.net/math-b.html#2022-md
>
> Abstract:
>
>   Most texts on Category Theory are written in a very terse style, in
>   which people pretend a) that all concepts are visualizable, and b)
>   that the readers can reconstruct the diagrams that the authors had
>   in mind based on only the most essential cues. As an outsider I
>   spent years believing that the techniques for drawing diagrams were
>   part of the oral culture of the field, and that the insiders could
>   read texts on CT reconstructing the "missing diagrams" in them line
>   by line and paragraph by paragraph, and drawing for each page of
>   text a page of diagrams with all the diagrams that the authors had
>   omitted. My belief was wrong: there are lots of conventions for
>   drawing diagrams scattered through the literature, but that unified
>   diagrammatic language did not exist. In this chapter I will show an
>   attempt to reconstruct that (imaginary) language for missing
>   diagrams: we will see an extensible diagrammatic language, called
>   DL, that follows the conventions of the diagrams in the literature
>   of CT whenever possible and that seems to be adequate for drawing
>   "missing diagrams" for Category Theory. Our examples include the
>   "missing diagrams" for adjunctions, for the Yoneda Lemma, for Kan
>   extensions, and for geometric morphisms, and how to formalize them
>   in Agda.
>
> [[]] =),
>   Eduardo Ochs
>   http://angg.twu.net/math-b.html
>
> --
> LOGICA-L
> Lista acadêmica brasileira dos profissionais e estudantes da área de
> Lógica <logica-l@dimap.ufrn.br>
> ---
> Você está recebendo esta mensagem porque se inscreveu no grupo "LOGICA-L"
> dos Grupos do Google.
> Para cancelar inscrição nesse grupo e parar de receber e-mails dele, envie
> um e-mail para logica-l+unsubscr...@dimap.ufrn.br.
> Para ver esta discussão na web, acesse
> https://groups.google.com/a/dimap.ufrn.br/d/msgid/logica-l/CADs%2B%2B6iHi46iHhc2pvHZ%2B3-7%3D%2B0dUuXWHbHYZdW7jC8C%2BZm2pA%40mail.gmail.com
> .
>

-- 
LOGICA-L
Lista acadêmica brasileira dos profissionais e estudantes da área de Lógica 
<logica-l@dimap.ufrn.br>
--- 
Você está recebendo esta mensagem porque se inscreveu no grupo "LOGICA-L" dos 
Grupos do Google.
Para cancelar inscrição nesse grupo e parar de receber e-mails dele, envie um 
e-mail para logica-l+unsubscr...@dimap.ufrn.br.
Para ver esta discussão na web, acesse 
https://groups.google.com/a/dimap.ufrn.br/d/msgid/logica-l/CAESt%3DXv0k5xME7nkE2fYi0%3Do_8pViVN5cFbfSizhvyWiTrLn7Q%40mail.gmail.com.

Responder a